A spring, a lock, and nothing to break · review
The cheapest screen in this catalogue and the smallest — which for an entry projector is a combination that works better than it sounds.
The bottom line The cheapest real improvement over a wall — small, plain, and better than it has any right to be with a modest projector.
Light per unit area decides what you see. An entry projector on a 72-inch screen produces a brighter, more contrasted image than the same machine on a 100-inch one, and the difference is visible immediately. Size is a trade against brightness rather than a free upgrade.
Three things, none of them about size. Flatness — walls have texture that projected light finds. Uniformity — walls are rarely one colour across two metres. A black border, which absorbs the overspill at the edge and makes the picture look sharper.
4:3, so films letterbox. At this price and size that matters less than it would on a large screen, and it should still be a decision rather than a surprise.
Everything about the fabric: gain, backing, tensioning. In a dark room with a long-throw projector, plain white behaves predictably, which is why this tier works at all.
A first screen, or a second one for another room. Cheap enough that outgrowing it costs nothing.
On sale from 48 € to 65 € on the German, American, British, French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores at the time of checking.
The Spanish Amazon listing is priced above 1.6× the cheapest store, which is normally a reshipping offer rather than a local price; it is left out of the range above.
Prices and availability are what Keepa reported on the date this page was updated; both move.
Prices quoted in this text were read on 4 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.
| Size | 72 inch — stated |
|---|---|
| Format | 4:3 — stated |
| Mechanism | Manual pull-down with pull cord — stated |
| Mounting | Wall mounted — stated |
| Gain | Not published in this listing |
| Amazon reference | B0FS8Z7354 (same reference on 6 Amazon marketplaces) |
| EAN | 0197988712305 |
Yes, for three reasons that have nothing to do with size: flatness, uniformity, and a black border. A wall is rarely as even as it looks with the lights on, and it has no border to absorb the overspill at the edge of the image.
Probably, and that is not an argument against it. A small screen with an entry projector is brighter and more convincing than a large one, and the screen is cheap enough that replacing it later is not a loss.
Pull-down · 100 inch · 200 × 150 cm image · 4:3
A spring-roller screen with nothing to fail — the mechanism is a spring and a lock, and the format is the thing to check.
Best for: A room that needs the wall back occasionally, where a motor is an unnecessary complication.
≈ 95 €
Pull-down · 217 cm TOTAL width · white fabric
The pull-down member of the same range as the motorised and fixed-frame models — same fabric, same published total width, cheaper mechanism.
Best for: Someone comparing mechanisms rather than fabrics — this range makes that comparison possible.
≈ 115 €
Pull-down · 178 × 178 cm · gain 1.0 stated · HDTV and 3D · ceiling or wall mount
One of only two screens in this catalogue to publish a gain figure — 1.0, neutral — and the only pull-down to do so.
Best for: A room with a wide sofa, where even brightness across every seat matters more than a bright centre.
≈ 44 €
