For the wall you are not allowed to drill
A floor stand answers a housing problem more often than a technical one: a rented flat, a glass wall, a partition that will not take an anchor. The specification that matters most is the one that is hardest to compare — the base. A wide, heavy foot resists the moment a large screen applies when it is knocked, and makers state a footprint and a total weight that are worth more attention than the load figure. Then height adjustment, which is the real advantage over a wall mount, and castors with locks if the screen moves between rooms. Cable management along the column is standard and still worth checking, because a stand puts the cables in plain sight. We compare VESA range, stated load capacity, height range, base footprint and total weight, castors, and cable management.
32–75" · stated to mount screens to 100 kg · centre shelf rated 45 kg · height-adjustable · steel frame · castors
A rolling cart with a centre shelf rated for 45 kg of equipment — which is what turns a stand into a whole system on wheels.
Best for: A large screen with a receiver and a console that all have to move together.
≈ £50 / 57 €
32–75" · 45 kg stated load · height-adjustable · lockable castors · laptop and disc-player shelf · black
Lockable castors and a shelf, stated explicitly — the two details that decide whether a rolling stand is usable rather than merely mobile.
Best for: A screen that moves between rooms regularly, where locking it in place matters as much as rolling it.
≈ $90 / £59 / 80 €
32–75" · VESA 200×200 to 600×400 · 50 kg stated load · height 1065–1415 mm · rubberised locking castors · steel shelf to 5 kg · webcam shelf
The only stand here that publishes its height range and its VESA limits — 1065 to 1415 mm, and patterns up to 600×400.
Best for: A large screen used at a set working height — a meeting room, a studio, a treadmill in front of a television.
≈ $135 / £130 / 140 €
