It disappears, and that is what you are paying for · review
A large motorised screen in 4:3, which is a format choice rather than an oversight — and the reason to read the aspect ratio before the diagonal.
The bottom line A lot of surface for the money, in a format that has to be a choice rather than a default — read the aspect ratio first.
4:3. A 16:9 film shown on it uses the full width and leaves unused fabric above and below. That is not a fault and it is a decision: the screen is taller than a film needs, which suits mixed use and wastes surface for a pure cinema room.
The wall, back, when the film ends. In a room that is also a living room that is the whole argument, and it is why this mechanism costs more than a pull-down.
A 12 V trigger — an input that follows the projector so the screen descends when the machine powers up. It is not stated here, which means a second remote for the screen.
No tab tensioning is stated. Tab-tensioned screens pull the fabric sideways with cords as it descends and stay markedly flatter; without it, expect some waviness near the sides. On a long-throw projector that is minor; with a short-throw machine it becomes visible.
240 × 180 cm of image. Add the casing to the width before measuring the wall, and remember that the black drop above the image sets how high the picture sits.
On sale at around 135 € on the German, French and Spanish Amazon stores at the time of checking.
The French and Spanish Amazon listings are priced above 1.6× the cheapest store, which is normally a reshipping offer rather than a local price; they are left out of the range above.
Listed but with no offer on the British Amazon store — the reference exists there and nobody is currently selling it.
Not found on the American and Italian Amazon stores, where the buy link falls back to a local search rather than to a page that does not exist.
Prices and availability are what Keepa reported on the date this page was updated; both move.
Prices quoted in this text were read on 4 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.
| Image size | 240 × 180 cm, 120 inch diagonal — stated |
|---|---|
| Format | 4:3 — stated |
| Mechanism | Motorised — stated |
| Gain | Not published in this listing |
| Tab tensioning | Not stated |
| Amazon reference | B00MN5N34U (same reference on 4 Amazon marketplaces) |
| EAN | 4260094735905 |
Only deliberately. A 16:9 film on a 4:3 screen uses the width and leaves black bands above and below, which wastes surface but does not harm the image. Where 4:3 makes sense is mixed use — presentations, older material, or a room where the extra height is useful.
Mostly, and not perfectly. Without tab tensioning, fabric hanging from a roller keeps some memory of being rolled, most visibly near the sides. Leave it fully extended for a week before judging it.
Motorised · 200 × 113 cm image · 16:9 · remote control included
A 16:9 motorised screen with the remote in the box — the format most films are shot in, and the control most listings leave you to discover.
Best for: A living room where the screen has to disappear and the material is modern — 16:9 with nothing wasted.
≈ 140 €
Motorised · 217 cm TOTAL width · white fabric
The motorised member of a range that publishes total width across every mechanism — which is what lets you compare a roller screen with a fixed frame properly.
Best for: A wall with a hard width constraint, where the screen has to disappear and the total dimension is what has to fit.
≈ 135 €
Motorised · 266 × 149 cm image · 16:9 · black metal casing
The largest motorised image in this catalogue — 266 cm wide — which is where a projector stops competing with a television altogether.
Best for: A dedicated room with a bright projector, where the point is an image no television can produce.
≈ 170 €
