Latency is the specification that decides it · review
In-ear television earphones on 2.4 GHz with a bypass output — the connection detail that lets the television speakers keep playing for everyone else.
The bottom line The bypass output is the reason to choose it: private listening that does not silence the room.
A bypass output. The transmitter takes the television’s audio and passes it on as well as broadcasting it. That means the room keeps its sound while one person listens privately — which is the actual situation most television headphones are bought for, and which a Bluetooth connection usually prevents by muting the television.
A dedicated link built for latency rather than a general protocol built for compatibility. It does not depend on both ends supporting a low-latency codec, which is the most common way Bluetooth disappoints here.
TOSLINK optical and AUX. Optical is the one most televisions still have, and it avoids the pairing and format questions entirely.
Lighter, cooler over a long evening, and less isolating. If the point is to not hear the room, over-ear is better; if the point is to hear the television clearly without disturbing anyone, in-ear is comfortable for longer.
A latency figure. It is the specification this category turns on, and no listing here publishes one.
On sale at around 82 € on the German Amazon store at the time of checking.
Listed but with no offer on the French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores — the reference exists there and nobody is currently selling it.
Not found on the American and British Amazon stores, where the buy link falls back to a local search rather than to a page that does not exist.
Prices and availability are what Keepa reported on the date this page was updated; both move.
Prices quoted in this text were read on 4 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.
| Transmission | 2.4 GHz — stated, not Bluetooth |
|---|---|
| Form | In-ear — stated |
| Inputs | TOSLINK optical and AUX — stated |
| Bypass | Audio bypass output — stated |
| Charging | Transmitter doubles as a charging box — stated |
| Amazon reference | B0H7BXLC85 (same reference on 4 Amazon marketplaces) |
| EAN | 4022107485746 |
It passes the audio on to the television speakers or a soundbar while the transmitter also sends it to the earphones. That means one person can listen privately without silencing the room, which is the situation this product is actually bought for.
For this job, generally yes. A dedicated 2.4 GHz link is designed for low latency rather than for broad compatibility, and it does not depend on codec support at both ends the way Bluetooth does.
Bluetooth 5.4 · transmitter and charging station · 3 audio modes · up to 40 hours stated battery
Bluetooth 5.4 with a transmitter included — the transmitter is what makes Bluetooth workable here, because it controls both ends of the link.
Best for: Long viewing sessions where battery life matters, with the transmitter removing the usual Bluetooth pairing problems.
≈ 60 €
Bluetooth 5.2 · low latency stated · designed for seniors · private listening
Television headphones aimed explicitly at older viewers, where the design priorities are volume, comfort and simplicity rather than specification.
Best for: A household where one person needs the television louder than everyone else — which is what this category exists for.
≈ 56 €
Bluetooth 5.3 · USB transmitter included · retractable headband · ultralight over-ear
The cheapest television headphones here, supplied with a USB transmitter — which is what makes them work with a television that has no Bluetooth.
Best for: A first pair of television headphones, for a television with a USB port and no Bluetooth.
≈ £35 / 37 €
