Skip to content

ESMART Economy EXF fixed frame screen, 212 cm total width review

A fixed frame whose listing states total width rather than image width — the measurement that actually has to fit between two windows.

The bottom line The same construction as any fixed frame, with the one measurement most listings leave you to calculate — and the same missing fabric specifications as the rest of the shelf.

The number that stops a return

Total width, 212 cm. Not the image, the whole object. A fixed frame adds to each side of the picture, and a listing that quotes a diagonal alone leaves the buyer to guess how much. Measuring the wall and comparing it with a stated total is a two-minute job that only works if the total is published.

What the construction gives you

Permanent flatness and a black border, as with any fixed frame. Those two things are the reason this construction exists and they do not vary much between makers at this price.

What the listing does not say

Gain and backing. This shelf publishes both rarely, and this page records their absence rather than assuming a neutral 1.0 — a fabric can be brighter on axis and narrower in viewing angle without saying so.

Choosing between this and the celexon

They are the same idea at the same price. The ESMART states total width; the celexon states image dimensions and a diagonal. Which is more useful depends on whether your constraint is the wall or the seating.

What to add

Nothing. A fixed frame is finished when it is on the wall — which is its other quiet advantage over the mechanisms that need a trigger, a remote or a place to retract into.

Availability

On sale from 160 € to 190 € on the German, French and Italian Amazon stores at the time of checking.

Listed but with no offer on the British and Spanish Amazon stores — the reference exists there and nobody is currently selling it.

Not found on the American Amazon store, where the buy link falls back to a local search rather than to a page that does not exist.

Prices and availability are what Keepa reported on the date this page was updated; both move.

Prices quoted in this text were read on 4 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.

What we like, and what we don't

Strengths

  • States TOTAL width, which is the figure that decides whether the screen fits the wall
  • A fixed frame, so permanently flat with a black border
  • A model code that identifies the mechanism, which makes the range easy to compare within itself

Compromises

  • No gain figure published
  • No black backing stated
  • White fabric, which is the right default in a dark room and the wrong one where ambient light cannot be controlled

Specifications

Total width212 cm — stated as total, not image width
FabricWhite — stated
ConstructionFixed frame — stated
GainNot published in this listing
BackingNot published in this listing
Amazon referenceB074PWC9BZ (same reference on 5 Amazon marketplaces)
EAN4260201939097

Questions people actually ask

Why is total width more useful than image width?

Because the screen has to physically fit. A frame adds several centimetres to each side of the image, and a listing that quotes only a diagonal leaves you to work out the rest. Where a maker publishes the total, it has answered the question that causes returns.

Is white the right fabric?

In a room where the light can be controlled, yes: it is neutral and returns light evenly. In a bright room a grey or ambient-light-rejecting surface lowers the black level more than it lowers perceived white, and that is a net gain.